Developing a low-cost approach to remediation and restoration of historic brine scars (2 Year Project)
EPA Grant Number: X83-2428-01
Title: Developing a low-cost approach to remediation and restoration of historic brine scars
Kerry L. Sublette, Sarkeys Professor of Environmental Engineering, University of Tulsa, 600 S. College Ave., Tulsa, OK 74104, (918)631-3085 Phone, (918)631-3268 Fax, email@example.com
Tim Todd, Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology, 4024 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, (785)532-6176 Phone, (785)532-5692 Fax, firstname.lastname@example.org
Institutions: University of Tulsa; Kansas State University
EPA Project Officer: Bala Krishnan
Project Period: 1/10/06-1/9/08
Project Amount: $122,330
Research Category: Remediation and restoration of soils
Description: This project will develop low-cost methods of remediation and restoration of a historic brine scar
Objective: The objective of this project to apply and test results from mining reclamation research in the remediation and restoration of historic brine scars. Specifically we will determine whether patch planting of vegetation (switchgrass and legumes) accelerates revegetation and the soil building process in these sites following adequate removal of brine components. Patch planting of switchgrass and legumes will be compared to row planting and opportunistic plant invasion in terms of recolonization of soil with beneficial micro- and meso-fauna. This project will be fully documented in terms of various above-ground (plant biomass, species diversity and richness) and below-ground (soil microbiology, chemistry, nematodes, mycorrhizal fungi, nutrient cycling) indicators of ecosystem restoration for the purposes of providing a scientific basis for the low-cost methods of restoration which will result from this project.
A second important goal of this project is the dissemination of this information. If this project is successful we intend to incorporate this information into soil remediation workshops for producers and state regulatory agencies through IPEC (subject to IAB and SAC approval). We will prepare guidance documents for remediation and restoration (using aided natural succession) of historic brine scars to be distributed by IPEC through the OCC and AOGC district offices and IPEC’s web site. The technology transfer deliverable from this project will be draft curricula and tools to be submitted to the IPEC Joint IAB/SAC Technology Transfer Committee for evaluation.
Approach: IPEC has produced guidelines for the remediation of fresh brine spills that are easy to understand, reduce the cost of remediation, and empower independent producers to take care of these spills themselves. These guidelines have been extremely popular with literally thousands distributed throughout the
For remediation we intend to use an extension of IPEC guidelines, including low-cost, subsurface drainage control and organic matter to increase permeability, for initial salinity reduction. One of us (Sublette) has used subsurface drainage systems for remediation of recent brine spills when natural drainage patterns were unacceptable for distribution of leached salt. These systems, basically French drains, are very effective in removing salt from the soil and cost-effective as well. In research done by Beckmann in Osage County this approach has been shown to work equally as well, at least on a small scale, for old salt damage as for new salt damage. This part of the project will allow us to refine this method for a large scale (two acres) remediation and provide additional information which can be used to predict costs for these types of efforts.
Following an acceptable reduction in salinity the next step in the restoration of a historic brine scar will be rebuilding topsoil and the re-establishment of a functioning soil ecosystem. Most restoration focuses on re-establishment of desirable plants but generally overlooks the resource base which maintains that plant community. However, the restoration of the plant community composition is inextricably bound up with the restoration of the soil ecosystem. Existing at the interface of the plant and soil are soil organisms. The vast majority of soil microfauna and mesofauna cannot be identified, cultured, or directly replaced. Clearly then one cannot restore, in the theoretical sense, the microbial communities that existed prior to disruption of the soil ecosystem. However, it is essential to restore the functions catalyzed by soil organisms. The only reasonable approach (cost wise) is to set up the appropriate conditions for restoration and allow natural colonization to occur. Those conditions include restoring soil structure and adding nutrients. To some extend this will be addressed in the remediation effort with the addition of organic matter (hay), fertilizer, and uncontaminated topsoil. The remediation effort is also a soil structure building exercise since soil permeability and drainage must be restored to leach salt from the soil. These efforts will be continued in the restoration phase with further additions of organic matter as necessary, inoculation with local topsoil, and careful attention given to N and P pools.
When a primary disturbance has the effect of removing crucial plant species the starting point for the restoration of plant communities must be the deliberate re-establishment of target plant species and subsequent management of the site to regulate their relative abundance and remove or discourage invasive species. One important outcome of work done by Beckmann was that switchgrass, a highly desirable forage plant and late successional tallgrass prairie grass, had excellent survivability in immature soil in Osage County resulting from recent soil rebuilding efforts in a 70-year old brine scar. This is an important observation because soils that have been reconstructed often have early-successional characteristics. In most cases plants that colonize early successional sites are not the vegetation desired for restoration. However, Beckmann’s results indicate that we will be able to successfully transplant native switchgrass from nearby areas into the remediatied brine scar at an early stage of restoration.
In the restoration phase we intend to apply and test results from mining reclamation in brine scar restoration environment that suggest that patch planting of vegetation accelerates revegetation and the soil building process by providing habitat for insects and animals that act as vectors for beneficial microorganisms and seeds. Patch planting of switchgrass will be compared to row planting and opportunistic plant invasion in terms of recolonization of soil with beneficial micro- and meso-fauna. This project will be fully documented in terms of various above-ground (plant biomass, species diversity and richness) and below-ground (soil microbiology, chemistry, nematodes, mycorrhizal fungi, nutrient cycling) indicators of ecosystem restoration for the purposes of providing a scientific basis for the low-cost methods which will result from this project.
Expected Results: The development of low-cost methods of remediation and restoration of historic brine scars and curricula for teaching these methods to small independent oil and gas producers.
Key Words: Brine scar, remediation, restoration, patch planting, soil reclamation