Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium (IPEC)

[Integrated Consortium for Energy and the Environment (ICEE)]

Activities and Accomplishments

November 15, 2007

In FY98, after a three-year campaign and the strong support of the Oklahoma and Arkansas Congressional Delegations, the Congress provided $1.5 million in dedicated funding for the Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium (IPEC), for the development of environmental technology and technology transfer for the domestic petroleum industry. Subsequent appropriations for IPEC have included: FY99 - $1,500,000; FY00 - $750,000; FY01 - $750,000; FY02 - $1,250,000; FY03 - $900,000; FY04 - $1,650,000; FY05 - $1,200,000.

Funded through the Office of Research and Development of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (ORD-EPA), the consortium has produced a research center which includes The University of Tulsa, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, and The University of Arkansas. IPEC's operating practices and linkages to the independent sector ensure that real problems in the domestic petroleum industry are addressed with real, workable solutions.

IPEC is developing cost-effective solutions for the environmental problems that represent the greatest challenge to the competitiveness of the domestic petroleum industry and providing much needed technology transfer to the small independent producers.

As envisioned and proposed by the Consortium, State-level matching funds have been obtained to support IPEC, creating a true Federal-State partnership in this critical area. In each of FY98 and FY99 IPEC received $375,000, and in FY00 $50,000 in matching funds from the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.

Funded Technology Development Projects

Since September 1998 IPEC has approved funding for 43 research projects. 23 of these were funded under the first IPEC EPA Grant – R82-7015-010 (9-1-98 through 8-31-02); 9 under the second EPA Grant – R83-0633-010 (9-1-02 through 8-31-07); and 11 to date under the third EPA Grant – X83-2428-010 (10-1-05 through 9-30-09).  Funded projects include, among others: the use of plants to clean contaminated soils; the natural biodegradation of gasoline by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen; the beneficial use of petroleum wastes as road materials; the control of the formation of toxic hydrogen sulfide in oil wells; the development of simple sampling devices to replace expensive live organisms to assess toxicity in contaminated soils; the treatment and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) in oil production equipment; the remediation of brine-impacted soils; development of a sound scientific basis for ecological risk assessment of petroleum production sites; improving the economics of well plugging; improving the efficiency of oil-water separation; enhancing the remediation of oil contaminated soils; nematodes as ecological indicators of soil ecosystem restoration at E&P sites; low-cost approach to remediation of historic brine scars; effective stormwater and sediment control during pipeline construction using a new filter fence concept; paraffin control in oil wells using anaerobic microorganisms; fiber rolls as a tool for revegetation of oil-brine contaminated watersheds; and analysis of MTBE and TBA biodegradation potential and remediation of MTBE- and TBA-contaminated aquifers using a new generation of Bio-Sep®  beads These projects were first reviewed and approved by our Industrial Advisory Board (dominated by independent producers) as relevant to our mission of increasing the competitiveness of the domestic petroleum industry and finally reviewed and approved by our Science Advisory Committee (SAC) on the basis of scientific quality.

During this period IPEC has provided $5,279,561 in funding for research projects. However, another $3,948,471 in funding for these projects has been secured by the investigators as matching funds from industry and industry organizations. This is over and above the matching funds provided by the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. IPEC has pledged to Congress to work for a 1:1 match of federal dollars. As you can see IPEC is living up to that promise! IPEC is a true public/private partnership.

Technology Transfer

IPEC's technology transfer program is directed toward providing useful tools for environmental compliance and cost reduction to independent producers. The first objective of this program is to raise the level of technical training of the field inspectors of the oil and gas regulatory bodies of Oklahoma and Arkansas including the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission, and the Osage Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs with regard to first response to spills, pollution prevention, and remediation of oil and brine spills. The second objective of this program is the development of checklists and tools for independent producers to assist them in environmental audits ("staying out of trouble checklists"), remediation of oil and brine spills, and first response to spills. Oklahoma and Arkansas regulatory field agents are being used to deliver these tools to the independent producers. The technology transfer program has also produced and maintains an IPEC website (http://ipec.utulsa.edu) which contains basic information about the consortium as well as results of ongoing research. Technology Transfer subcontracts for outside services issued by IPEC during the period 9-1-98 to the present have totaled $974,355, with matching funds secured by the PIs in the amount of $396,480. IPEC established an in-house position of Technology Transfer Outreach Manager in October, 2002 in order to continue to expand and improve the consortium's technology transfer program. IPEC's technology transfer flagship is the International Petroleum Environmental Conference. In November, 2007, IPEC held the 14th International Petroleum Environmental Conference in Houston, TX. There were approximately 300 in attendance from academia and all facets of the oil and gas industry, including independent and major producers, service industry representatives, and state and federal regulators. The program for the 14th conference featured three pre-conference workshops, two mid-week workshops, five plenary lectures, 129 technical presentations and posters, and an exhibits area with 38 companies and organizations participating. A well-attended Special Symposium titled "Environmental Implications of Fuel Ethanol" was held at the end of the conference. The 15th conference is currently being planned, and a venue will be announced early in 2008.

The Continuing Crisis in the Domestic Petroleum Industry

Much attention has been paid recently to the high costs to consumers of gasoline and natural gas. Energy experts agree that the price increases currently being experienced were brought on by short-term shocks that resulted from sudden changes in supply and demand. On the demand side there has been increasing demand for petroleum worldwide, especially in the Far East. On the supply side, OPEC and several non-OPEC countries have removed significant amounts of crude oil from production. Once again America has been held hostage to the marketing whims of foreign producers and we are in no position to respond. Since 1990 there has been a 27% decline in the number of jobs in the U.S. exploring and producing oil and gas and the number of working drilling rigs has seriously declined. Thirty-six refineries have closed since 1992 and no new refineries have been built since 1976. Most energy analysts agree that we need to "drill our way out" of the current high prices and shortages; however, the industry's infrastructure (in terms of equipment and trained personnel) cannot support the amount of drilling activity current prices would otherwise encourage.

In order to regain energy security the U.S. must have a coherent domestic energy strategy. Some may be willing to entrust the health of the U.S. economy to windmills and solar-powered cars, but it will be a stable and profitable domestic oil and gas industry that is the nation’s best defense against OPEC market manipulations. The current upswing in crude oil prices may eventually stimulate the industry. However, the record low prices that preceded the current increases have left many companies in financial positions that make it impossible to launch new exploration activities. Additionally, many in the industry are simply uneasy with the volatility that has come to characterize the industry. Much of U.S. domestic oil production is carried out by independent producers who are producing from mature fields left behind by the majors. Although there is a significant resource base in these fields, this is the most difficult and the most costly oil to produce. The independent producer has only one source of revenue--the sale of oil and gas. There is no vertical depth to his business.

The high cost of environmental compliance has made domestic oil production noncompetitive with foreign oil and placed the U.S. at a strategic disadvantage. IPEC is working to strengthen the domestic petroleum industry and reduce the impact of market volatility by providing cost-effective environmental technologies to solve those problems that are having the greatest impact on production costs. These efforts are especially needed now as we develop new sources of natural gas such as coal-bed methane. This new source of natural gas is desperately needed to meet our nation's energy demand but coal-bed methane presents some unique environmental problems which must be addressed in a cost-effective manner. A strong and stable domestic petroleum industry is our best hedge against foreign market manipulation.

IPEC's Response to Critical Research Needs

IPEC is well on its way to fulfilling its pledge to Congress of responsiveness to the needs of domestic petroleum industry and fiscal responsibility. IPEC is continually probing our Industrial Advisory Board for new ways to assist the industry and continually seeking out cost-effective technical solutions to these problems through an aggressive solicitation and review process. IPEC will continue to work with the domestic petroleum industry to provide technical solutions to those environmental problems that represent the greatest challenge to the competitiveness of the industry. In addition, IPEC proposes to launch two new technology transfer initiatives.

Cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Since December, 1997 IPEC has worked closely with the EPA to meet all internal requirements for funding of research centers. In response to these requirements IPEC has

1.       formed a Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) to perform technical reviews of IPEC research proposals,

2.       developed a Quality Management Plan for the Consortium,

3.       appointed a Quality Assurance / Quality Control Officer, and

4.       undergone successful peer review as an EPA Research Center.

IPEC has formed an excellent working relationship with the Environmental Engineering Division of the EPA National Center for Environmental Research and Quality Assurance. IPEC's grant from EPA (FY98 appropriation) was finalized September 2, 1998.

Proposal Solicitation and Review

IPEC Industrial Advisory Board (IAB)

Even before the grant from EPA was finalized, IPEC proceeded in its solicitation and review process so that the Consortium would be in a position to fund projects as soon as funds were made available. A total of 77 proposals were received as a result of two solicitations issued by IPEC prior to finalizing the EPA grant. The first step in the review of these proposals was an evaluation by the IPEC Industrial Advisory Board (IAB). This Board, formed in early 1998, is composed of environmental professional from the domestic petroleum industry and is dominated by representatives of independent producers. The IAB serves as a test of relevancy to IPEC's mission as required by our strategic plan. A proposal must be deemed relevant to IPEC's mission by the IAB to move forward in the review process.

The IPEC IAB has met numerous times since January, 1998 and has accomplished the following:

1.       elected a chair;

2.       developed criteria for evaluating proposals;

3.       developed a charter to govern activities of the Board;

4.       developed an initial list of 26 critical research needs in the domestic petroleum industry and reviewed and updated this list in April 2000;

5.       reviewed the 187 proposals received by IPEC from the first 11 solicitations and approved 59 to go forward in the review process; and

6.       provided guidance to IPEC on technology transfer needs in the domestic petroleum industry.

IPEC Science Advisory Committee (SAC)

The SAC is composed of highly qualified scientists and engineers from academia and national laboratories. The role of the SAC is to review proposals for scientific quality. Only those proposals approved by the IAB as relevant to IPEC’s mission proceed to this second stage of review. The following actions were taken by the SAC on the first 59 proposals approved by the IAB as relevant to IPEC's mission:

1.       39 proposals approved for full funding;

2.       4 proposals approved for "proof-of-concept funding";

Technology Transfer

IPEC has followed the guidance of the IAB in establishing a technology transfer program to meet the needs of the domestic petroleum industry. The development of this program has included:

1.       establishing and maintaining a world wide web page (http://ipec.utulsa.edu);

2.       developing workshops for independent producers on remediation and first response to spills of produced fluids;

3.       developing workshops for independent producers on regulatory compliance;

4.       establishing scholarships for regulatory technical personnel for participation in the International Petroleum Environmental Conference; and

5.       developing and distributing self-assessment kits, site checklists, soil and water analysis kits, remediation guidelines for oil and brine spills, and instructional videos and DVD’s to aid independent producers and regulators in the field.

6.       establishing a position of Technology Transfer Outreach Manager in order to continue to expand and improve the consortium technology transfer program.

7.       assisting to organize and present a yearly International Petroleum Environmental Conference designed to explore issues and solutions in exploration, production and refining..

14th International Petroleum Environmental Conference

The 14th International Petroleum Environmental Conference was held November 6-9, 2007 in Houston, TX. The Conference Chair was Kerry L. Sublette, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK. Conference Co-Chair was John Veil, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, DC.

The conference was organized by the Integrated Consortium for Energy and the Environment (ICEE – formerly IPEC) and University of Tulsa Continuing Engineering and Science Education, in collaboration with the Office of Research and Development of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Attendance at this year's conference was approximately 300.

This conference brings together professionals from industry, government and academia who seek solutions to environmental problems of a technical, legal and regulatory nature. Features of the 14th Conference included:

  • 3 pre-conference workshops on Monday, November 5, 2007:

    "Waste Minimization in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production", instructed by Bart Sims, Texas Railroad Commission, Austin, TX

“Utilization of Stable Isotopes in Environmental and Forensic Geochemistry Studes”, instructed by Paul Philp, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

"IPEC Soil Remediation Workshop," instructed by G. Phil Spurlin, BEACON Environmental Assistance Corporation, Edmond, OK

  • 2 workshops on Wednesday, November 7, 2007:

    ”Application of Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment”, instructed by Margaret Roy & Sandra Smith, URS Corporation, Austin, TX; Brenda Basile, URS Corporation, Housto, TX; and Ron Porter, Noblis, San Antonio, TX

    "Planning for the Use of Advanced Site Characterization Tools”, instructed by Greg Davis and Dora Ogles, Microbial Insights, Inc., Rockford, TN; and Robert Pirkle, Microseeps, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
  • Plenary presentations featuring leading experts exploring timely petroleum-related environmental problems. Speakers included John Veil, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, DC; H. William Hochheiser, US DOE, Washington, DC; Jeffrey Cline, AB Engineering, Inc., Houston, TX: John Candler, MI SWACO, Houston, TX; and Joseph Suflita, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  • 15 technical sessions where specific solutions to environmental problems were discussed through presentation of technical papers. Session titles were as follows:
    1. Remediation of Hydrocarbon Spills I
    2. Legal and Regulatory Issues
    3. Remediation of Brine-Impacted Soils
    4. Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention
    5. Beneficial Reuse of Produced Water
    6. Remediation of Hydrocarbon Spills II
    7. MTBE/TBA
    8. Geophysical Tools for Locating & Mapping Brine Impacts
    9. CBM Produced Water Treatment Technologies Special Session
    10. Bioremediation of Groundwater and Soils I
    11. Forensic Geochemistry & Site Assessment
    12. Brownfields Programs / Oil-Water-Solid Separation
    13. Produced Water Treatment Technologies Special Session – Offshore and Other
    14. Bioremediation of Groundwater and Soils II
    15. Drill Waste Management / Environmental Management, Compliance and Auditing
  • A poster session, contributed to by both students and professionals.
  • A large and well-attended exhibits section with 38 companies and organizations participating.
  • A half-day symposium on "Environmental Implications of Fuel Ethanol," chaired by Kerry L. Sublette, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK.                      Presentations in this symposium were made by the following individuals:
    • Brent Stafford, Shell Global Solutions (US), Inc., Houston, TX
    • John T. Wilson, US EPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center, Ada, OK
    • Barb Fletcher, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
    • Roy F. Spalding, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
    • Doug Mackay, University of California – Davis, Davis, CA
    • Diego Gomez, Rice University, Houston, TX
    • William Rixey, University of Houston, Houston, TX
    • John R. Gibbons, URS Corporation, Milwaukee, WI

The following organizations Co-Sponsored the 14th conference and helped promote the event:

  • ALLU Group
  • Argonne National Laboratory
  • Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
  • Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission
  • Atlantic Richfield (a BP affiliated company)
  • BEACON Environmental Assistance Corporation
  • Blackhawk Technology
  • CETCO Oilfield Services Company
  • Chesapeake Energy
  • Chevron
  • Commission on Marginally Producing Oil and Gas Wells
  • ConocoPhillips
  • DeepEarth Technologies
  • Devon Energy Corp.
  • Explorer Pipeline
  • Geovation Engineering
  • Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC)
  • Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
  • Kansas Independent Oil and Gas Association
  • Langan Engineering & Environmental Services 
  • Microbial Insights, Inc.
  • National Environmental & Remediation Consortium (NEER), Kansas State University
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • New Mexico Oil and Gas Association
  • Newpark Mats & Integrated Services
  • Oklahoma Corporation Commission
  • Oklahoma Energy Resources Board (OERB)
  • Primary Natural Resources
  • Railroad Commission of Texas, O&G Division
  • Samson Resources
  • TRC Solutions
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Yates Petroleum

In addition, the following organizations were members of the Corporate Sponsors and Conference Advocates groups this year:

Corporate Sponsors:

  • ALLU Group
  • Atlantic Richfield (a BP affiliated company)
  • BEACON Environmental Assistance Corporation
  • Blackhawk Technology
  • CETCO Oilfield Services Company
  • Chesapeake Energy
  • Chevron
  • ConocoPhillips
  • DeepEarth Technologies
  • Devon Energy Corp.
  • Explorer Pipeline Company
  • Geovation Engineering
  • Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
  • Langan Engineering & Environmental Services
  • Microbial Insights, Inc.
  • Newpark Mats & Integrated Services
  • Primary Natural Resources
  • Samson Resources
  • TRC Solutions
  • Yates Petroleum

The organizers of the conference gratefully acknowledge the assistance and support of all the Co-Sponsors and Corporate Sponsors. Their efforts contribute greatly to the overall success of the event each year.

The 15th International Petroleum Environmental Conference is currently being planned.  Information concerning this event will be available early in 2008.