TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2002 1:30 PM - 5:30 PM

BIOREMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBONS I

• Bioremediation Effectiveness: Removing Hydrocarbons While Minimizing Environmental Impact Roger C. Prince, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co., Annandale, NJ
• Guidelines for the Bioremediation of Freshwater and Saltwater Wetlands Albert Venosa, U.S. EPA-NRMRL, Cincinnati, OH
• Biotreating E&P Wastes: Lessons Learned from 1992-2002 S. McMillen, ChevronTexaco Energy Research & Technology Co., Richmond, CA
• Bioremediation of a California Crude Oil Distillate Paul D. Lundegard, Unocal, Brea, CA; G. Garcia and J. Star, Unocal, Guadalupe, CA
• Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Ten Years of Research and Field Experience Raymond C. Loehr, The University of Texas, Austin, TX; David V. Nakles, The RETEC Group, Inc., Monroeville, PA
• Does Bioavailability Limit hydrocarbon Biodegradation? Results from Slurry Bioremediation Experiments Involving PAH and Alkane Contaminated Aged Soils Michael H. Huesemann, R. Bartha, T. Hausmann, and T. Fortman, Batelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, WA
• Eco-Polishing of Biotreated Oily Soils to Meet Strategic Objectives A.J. Stewart, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN; S. McMillen, ChevronTexaco Energy Research & Technology Co., Houston, TX; M.A. Callaham, USDA Forest Service, Clemson, SC
• Bioremediation and Ecotoxicity of Petroleum-Impacted Soils Joseph P. Salanitro, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX
• Cometabolic Biodegradation of Petroleum Compounds William T. Stringfellow, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND WASTE MINIMIZATION

• Small-Footprint Plugging System for Abandoned Wells Larry T. Watters, Outpost Enterprises, Inc., Duncan, OK
• New Technology to Protect the Environment When Sealing Fluids or Gases Under Pressure Harold Palmour, The Palmour Group, Lufkin, TX
• Esters as Drilling Fluids - Are They All the Same? John Hall, Baroid/Halliburton, Houston, TX
• Interactive Website for Drilling Waste Management Brandy Fidler, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; John Veil Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
• Resource Recovery Remediation™ from Liability to Profitability Dennis L. Patton, Raba Kistner Consultants, Inc., San Antonio, TX
• HMCS (Harmonized Mandatory Control Scheme) and the Issue of Substitution Sarah Glover, M-I, Aberdeen, Scotland
• Buckling Pin Devices Used in Exploration, Production and Refining Julian Taylor, Buckling Pin/Rupture Pin Technology, Oklahoma City, OK
• Comparison of the Effectiveness of "Bug-Traps" vs. Conventional Coupons in Evaluating Microbial Biofilm Communities in Oilfield Brine Gary Jenneman, Robert Webb, and Erin Holle, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; Kerry L. Sublette, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; D.C. White and Aaron Peacock, Center for Biomarker Analysis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; Greg Davis, Microbial Insights, Inc., Rockford, TN

PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT

• Evaluation of Subsurface Flow Wetlands vs. Free-water Surface Wetlands Treating NPR-3 Produced Water - Year No. 2 Lorri Jackson, Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, Casper, WY
• Removal of BTEX from Produced Waters Using Surfactant Modified Zeolite Robert S. Bowman and J. Michael Ranck, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM; Guifang Tan and Lynn E. Katz, University of Texas, Austin, TX; Enid J. Sullivan, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
• Alternative Use of Produced Water in Aquaculture and Hydroponic Systems at Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3 Lorri Jackson, Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, Casper, WY
• Integrating Geologic and Hydrologic Information to Mitigate Produced Water in the Raton Basin of New Mexico and Colorado Scott Cooper, Thomas F. Corbet, Jr., Christopher A. Rautman, Bill W. Arnold, and John C. Lorenz, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM; Paul M. Basinski, El Paso Production Company, El Paso, TX
• Impacts of Oilfield Produced Waters on the Salinity of the Ogallala Formation Aquifer in a Nine-County Area Near Lubbock, Texas James Otton and Phyllis Scott, U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO
• Overview of Texas A&M's Program for the Beneficial Use of Oil Field Produced Water David Burnett, W.E. Fox, and G.L. Theodori, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
• Creative Strategies for Produced Water Disposal in the Rocky Mountain Region Deidre Boysen, Jessica Boysen, John Boysen, and J. Harju, BC Technologies, Ltd., Laramie, WY
• One Decade of FTE(r) Process Research, Development, Demonstration, and Commercial Deployment John Boysen, Deidre Boysen, J. Harju, and T. Larson, BC Technologies, Ltd., Laramie, WY
• Use of Produced Water for Oil and Gas Drilling in the San Juan Basin Dan Erskine, Maxim Technologies, Inc., Albuquerque, NM; P.W. Bergman and D.L. Wacker, Conoco, EP Americas, Houston, TX

POSTER SESSION 5:30 PM - 7:00 PM

• Petroleum Degradation by Filamentous Fungi Judith Liliana Solorzano Lemos, Andrea Camaradella de Lima Rizzo, Valeria Millioli, and Ronaldo Santos, Centro De Tecnologia Mineral - CETEM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Adriana Ururahy Soriano, Centro de Pesquisas e Desenvolvimento Leopoldo Americo M. de Mello - CENPES, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Maria Inez de Moura Sarquis, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• Bioremediation: The Treatment of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Using Bioreactors Andrea Camaradella de Lima Rizzo, Judith Liliana Solorzano Lemos, Valeria Millioli, and Ronaldo Santos, Centro De Tecnologia Mineral - CETEM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Adriana Ururahy Soriano, Centro de Pesquisas e Desenvolvimento Leopoldo Americo M. de Mello - CENPES, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; S.G.F. Leite, The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• Development of DBT-Monooxigenase Mutants by Directed Evolution for Organic Sulfur Removal Julia Raquel Acero Reyes and Leonardo Mogollon G., ECOPETROLInstituto Colombiano del Petroleo, Santander, Colombia
• Forensic Geochemistry Studies for the Mexican Petroleum Industry Jose Luis Mondragon, Lilia Castro Ortiz, Andres Rosas Molina, Gloria E. Avelino y Zapata and Maria Cristina Gonzalez Lozano, Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo, Mexico City, Mexico
• Evaluation of Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation Techniques in the Bioremediation's Process of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Contaminated Soil Pedro Veltri Ormastroni da Trindade and S.G.F. Leite, The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; L.G. Sobral, A.C.L. Rizzo, J.L.S. Lemos, and V.S. Millioli, Center of Mineral Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; A.U. Soriano, Petrobras Research Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• A Case Study of Volumetric Characterization and Remediation of Free-Phase Jet Fuel at an Aerospace Engines Facility in Phoenix, Arizona Robert J. Frank, CH2M Hill, Tempe, AZ; Keith D. Bowers, Honeywell International, Inc., Phoenix, AZ
• Effects of Surfactants at Low Concentration on Biodegradation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Valeria Souza Millioli, A.C.L. Rizzo, J.L.S. Lemos, and R. Santos, Center of Mineral Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; A.U. Soriano, Petrobras Research Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; S.G.F. Leite, The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• Development of a New Benchmark Model for the Design of Waste Minimization Systems for Process Industries Kingsley Abhulimen and Susu A.A., University of Lagos, Nigeria
• Soil Ecosystem Recovery Following Managed and Unmanaged Bioremediation Chintan Mehta, K.L. Sublette, and L. Ford, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; J. Brokaw, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK; K. Duncan, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; T. Todd, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
• Revegetation of Crude Oil Contaminated and Uncontaminated Prairie Sites Disturbed by Tilling and Earth Moving Chintan Mehta, K.L. Sublette, and L. Ford, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; J. Brokaw, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK; K. Duncan, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; G. Thoma, University of Arkansas

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2002 8:00 AM - 12:00 NOON

PETROLEUM BIODEGRADATION AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

• Use of an On-Line Biofilm Monitor for Optimizing Biocide Treatments in Oilfield Waters Gary Jenneman, R.H. Webb, and E. Holle, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK
• The Anaerobic Biodegradability of Whole Gasoline (IPEC-Funded Project) Joseph Suflita, G. Townsend, and R. Prince, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
• Significant Oil Recoveries by Biosurfactants Requires Viscosity Control and a Cosurfactant Michael J. McInerney, S. Maudgalya, M. Folmsbee, R. Knapp, and D. Nagle, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
• Biodegradation of Benzene in Salt-Impacted Soil by Halophile and Halotolerant Bacteria (IPEC-Funded Project) Babu Fathepure and Carla Nicholson, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
• In Situ Transformation of Deuterated Toluene and Xylene to Benzylsuccinic Acid Analogs in BTEXcontaminated Aquifers Jennifer A. Field, Dominik Reusser, and Jonathan Istok, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; Harry Beller, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
• Anaerobic Hydrocarbon Metabolites as Indicators of In Situ Hydrocarbon Biodegradation in Aquifers Lisa Gieg and J.M. Suflita, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
• In Situ Monitoring of Microbial Communities in Contaminated Groundwater Using Bio-Sep(r) Bug Traps A. Peacock and D.C. White, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; G. Davis, Microbial Insights, Rockford, TN; K.L. Sublette, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
• Bioremediation of MTBE in Aquifers by Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation Joseph Salanitro, University of St. Thomas, Houston, TX; Gerard Spinnler, Shell Global Solutions, Inc., Houston, TX; Paul Johnson, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

FATE AND TRANSPORT OF BRINE AND HYDROCARBON RELEASES IN SOILS & WATER, NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA

• Produced Water and Hydrocarbon Releases at the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Sites, Osage County, OK: Introduction and Geologic Setting James Otton and Robert Zielinski, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
• Environmental Impacts of Petroleum Production: 1-The Fate of Inorganic and Organic Chemicals in Produced Water from the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research B Site, Osage County, OK Yousif Kharaka and Evangelos Kakouros, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA; Marvin M. Abbott, U.S. Geological Survey, Oklahoma City, OK
• Environmental Impacts of Petroleum Production: 2-The Fate of Inorganic and Organic Chemicals in Produced Water from the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research A Site, Osage County, OK James J. Thordsen, Yousif Kharaka and Gil Ambats, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
• Use of Soil Leachates to Define the Extent of Brine-Impacted Soils at Oil Production Site "B", Osage-Skiatook Project, Northeastern Oklahoma Robert A. Zielinski, Cynthia A. Rice, and James K. Otton, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
• Preliminary Geophysical Characterization of Two Oil Production Sites, Osage County, Oklahoma - Osage Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Project Bruce D. Smith, Robert J. Bisdorf, Robert J. Horton, James K. Otton, and Ray S. Hutton, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
• Impact of Oil Production Releases on Soil Chemical Properties at the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Project Site Donald H. Kampbell, U.S. EPA, Ada, OK
• Characterization of Soils and Rock at an Active Oil Production Site: Effects of Brine and Hydrocarbon Contamination Cynthia A. Rice, James D. Cathcart, Robert A. Zielinski, and James K. Otton, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
• Hydrologic Controls on the Subsurface Transport of Oil-Field Brine at the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research (OSPER) B Site, Oklahoma William N. Herkelrath and Yousif K. Kharaka, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
• Environmental Impacts of Petroleum Production: The Fate of Petroleum and Other Organics Associated with Produced Water from the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Site, Osage County, OK Francis Hostettler, Yousif K. Kharaka and E.M. Godsy, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
• Real-Time Kinematic Surveying at the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Site, Osage County, Oklahoma Marvin M. Abbott, U.S. Geological Survey, Oklahoma City, OK

LEGAL AND REGULATORY ISSUES

• Environmental Management of Oil and Gas Development in the State of Alaska Judd Peterson, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage, AK
• Implementation of the November 20, 2001 Amendment to Louisiana Commercial E&P Waste Facility and Transfer Station Regulations Gary W. Snellgrove, State of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Baton Rouge, LA
• The Oklahoma Oil and Gas Conservation Division's New Reporting and Cleanup Guidance for Crude Oil and Condensate Spills Patricia Billingsley, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, Oklahoma City, OK
• Permitting Oil and Gas Projects in Alaska Sally Rothwell, Phillips Alaska, Inc., Anchorage, AK
• Kentucky Field Inspection PDA Application Rick Bender, Kentucky Division of Oil and Gas, Frankfort, KY; Paul Jehn, Ground Water Protection Council, Oklahoma City, OK; Jason A. Patton, ALL Consulting, Tulsa, OK
• Coordinating Special Use Permit Application for Oil and Gas Exploration B. Wayne Hoskins, T.H. Quest, Inc., Dallas, TX; Patrick Chubb, Covington and Associates, Pass Christian, MS
• Stream Flow Dependent Water Quality Changes in Cedar Bayou (Texas) with Implications for Permitting Stephen B. Ellingson, Koch Hydrocarbon, LP, Wichita, KS
• Environmental Collaboration Richard S. Bayer, Manley Oil Company, Los Angeles, CA
• Including XML Schema Tags For Production And Injection Data Reporting To Regulatory Agencies in the PIDD: A Business Case W. Thomas Gillespie & Deborah Gillespie, Virtual Engineering Solutions, Inc., Melrose, FL; Stan Belieu, Nebraska Oil & Gas Commission, Sidney, NE

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2002 8:00 AM - 12:00 NOON

PHYTOREMEDIATION

• Phytoremediation Field Studies: The Remediation Technologies Development Forum P.A. Kulakow, B.A. Leven, and L. Erickson, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
• Comparison of Vegetated and Unvegetated Treatments in Bioremediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil James L. Brown, Lockheed Martin/REAC, Edison, NJ; R.J. Nadeau and H. Allen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Environmental Response Center, Edison, NJ
• The Effectiveness of Phytoremediation as a Tertiary Treatment of Aged Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from a Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Zakia D. Parrish, M.K. Banks, and A. Paul Schwab, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
• Field Scale Phytoremediation of Petroleum- Contaminated Soil (IPEC-Funded Project) Duane Wolf, P.M. White, G.J. Thoma, and E.E. Gbur, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
• Re-vegetation of an Oil/Brine Spill: Interaction Between Plants and Mycorrhizal Fungi Wes Colgan III, Milan C. Vavrek, and J. Bolton, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA
• Mathematical Modeling of Phytoremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils (IPEC-Funded Project) Greg Thoma, D. Wolf, L. Thanh, S. Ziegler, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
• Vegetative Remediation of Sediments from Fort Riley, Kansas P.A. Kulakow, X. Feng, B.A. Leven, and L. Erickson, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
• Identification of Plant Traits that Enhance Biodegradation of Oil Milan C. Vavrek and W.J. Campbell, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA

REMEDIATION OF BRINE IMPACTED SOILS

• Produced Water Spills and Ground Water Quality, The Relative Importance of Environmental and Release Characteristics Jan Hendrickx, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM; R. Hicks and G. Rodriguez, R.T. Hicks Consultants, Ltd., Albuquerque, NM; J. Simunek, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, Riverside, CA
• Application of an Electro-Dialysis Reversal (EDR) Process to Remediate a Brine-Impacted Aquifer Joe Reed, ARCADIS G&M, Midland, TX
• Phytoremediation Technology for Oilfield Salinity N.P. Yensen, CIAD and NyPa International, Inc., Tucson, AZ; D.J. Carty, GreenBridge EarthWorks, NyPa-GreenBridge, Bryan, TX; R.T. Martin and J.K. Rudder, Jr., NyPa-GreenBridge, El Dorado, AR; K.N. Toderich, Samarkand Branch of ASUz, T. Malik, Uzbekistan; J. Peacock, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait
• Re-Vegetation of Brine Damaged Soil: A Soil Rebuilding Approach Rene Bernier and J. Myers, ChevronTexaco, Bellaire, TX; J. Hall, Alto Technology Resources, Inc., Houston, TX
• Improving Infiltration and Permeability for Halophytes in Oilfield Salt-Impacted Soils D.J. Carty, GreenBridge EarthWorks, NyPa-GreenBridge, Bryan, TX; N.P. Yensen, NyPa International, Inc., Tucson, AZ; R.T. Martin and J.K. Rudder, Jr., NyPa-GreenBridge, El Dorado, AR
• Remediation of Brine-Impacted Soil with Hay (IPEC-Funded Project) Laura Ford, K. Carter, B. Mason, K. Sublette, and E. Levetin, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; K. Duncan, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
• Adaptations of Plants to Metal/Salt Contaminated Environments: Glandular Structures and Salt Excretion K.N. Toderich, Smarkand Branch of Uzbek's Academy of Sciences; Tsuneo Tsukatani, Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University, Japan; C.C. Black, University of Georgia, GA; Keiji Takabe, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan; Yukio Katayama, University of Human Environments, Okazaki, Japan

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND PUBLIC OUTREACH

• Reaching Out to Independents - The Oklahoma Marginal Well Commission Liz Fajen, The Commission on Marginally Producing Oil & Gas Wells, Oklahoma City, OK
• An Overview of "Taking Care of Business" - The IPEC Producer's Workshop - Using the Quick Check Site Checklist for a New Mexico Case Study (IPEC Technology Transfer) G. Phil Spurlin, Beacon Environmental Assistance Corporation, Edmond, OK
• Environmental Technology Transfer Issues - Who, What, and How Blase Leven, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
• Comprehensive Safety Programs are Good Investments Sam Farris, The Commission on Marginally Producing Oil & Gas Wells, Oklahoma City, OK
• Taking Technology Transfer to the Small Independent Producer During Tough Times (IPEC Technology Transfer) George Collington, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK; Pat Hall and Nancy Felts, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
• Empowering Small Independent Oil & Gas Producers to Solve Environmental Problems (IPEC Technology Transfer) Kerry L. Sublette, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
• Successful Brine Remediation - The Power of People and Partnerships Priscilla Kelly, Southwest Brine Coalition, Mt. Vernon, IN
• Challenges and Triumphs of Small Oil and Gas Operators Producing in California Oilfields Iraj Ershaghi, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; D. Duttlinger and Lance Cole, PTTC, Houston, TX

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2002 1:30 PM - 5:30 PM

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES & SOLUTIONS IN THE EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION OF NATURAL GAS AND GAS CONDENSATES

• Benefits of Using Deliquescing Desiccants for Gas Dehydration David Mirdadian and B. Bowman, NATCO Group, Houston, TX
• Field Examination of Glycol and BTEX in the Subsurface at Natural Gas Processing Facilities James A. Sorenson, M.D. Kurz, J.R. Gallagher, and S.B. Hawthorne, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
• Subsurface Fate of Gas Condensates James A. Sorenson, J.R. Gallagher, S.B. Hawthorne, A. Legadee, and D.J. Miller, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
• Using Environmental Regulatory Requirements to Target Natural Gas Technology Development Deborah Elcock and John Gasper, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
• Natural Gas STAR ConocoPhillips E&P - San Juan Basin, New Mexico Robert A. Wirtanen, Phillips Petroleum Co., Farmington, NM
• Equilibrium Models for Coalbed Methane Production and CO2 Sequestration Khaled Gasem, M. Sudibandriyo, Z. Pan, J.E. Fitzgerald, and R.L. Robinson, Jr., Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
• Is Souring in Oil Fields More Efficiently Reduced by Nitrate or by Nitrite Injection? G.E. Jenneman, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; A.E. Greene, M. Nemati, and G. Voordouw, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
• H2S Removal from Natural Gas and Sulphur Commercial Application Zdravko Spiric, INA-NAFTAPLIN, Zagreb, Croatia; Tomislav Seletkovi, PETROKEMIJA, Kutina, Croatia
• Challenging Traditional Biodegradation Tests: The Biodegradation of Glutaraldehyde Douglas McIlwaine, The Dow Chemical Company, Bound Brook, NJ

REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS

• Surfactant Enhanced Ex-Situ Washing of Oil-Impacted Soils and Drill Cuttings (IPEC-Funded Project) David Sabatini, E. Acosta, J. Childs, and F. Scamehorn, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
• Why Didn't It Work? Three Case Studies of Apparent In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Failures and What the Sites Were Screaming to Reveal! William L. Lundy, BMS, Inc., Tinley Park, IL
• Environmental Design Contest: Remediation Solutions David Griffin, Consultant, Mayhill, NM
• Remediation of Benzene Under a CTA Bus Stop Near Downtown Chicago William L. Lundy, BMS, Inc., Tinley Park, IL; P. Clark, Patrick Engineering, Inc., Lisle, IL
• Use of Organic Absorbents for In-Situ Remediation of Spilled Oil G.A. Breitenbeck, A. DeSilva, and B. Grace, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
• Application of the Expedited Site Assessment Methodology to Sites Contaminated with Petroleum Products in Connecticut Farhad Nadim, R. Carley, C. Perkins, G. Hoag, and A. Dahmani, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; P. Zack, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT
• Using Risk Based Cleanup Goals for In Situ Chemical Remediation of PCE in Vadose Zone Soils Under a Voluntary Cleanup Program James H. Viellenave, J.P. Lauer, J.V. Fontana, ESN Rocky Mountain Direct Geochemical, Golden, CO
• Case Study: Use of a Risk Basis to Establish Cleanup Critera and Remediate an Exploration and Production Site Joseph A. Zupan, Zephyr Environmental Corporation, Austin, TX
• Remediation Options for Sites Contaminated with Petroleum Products in the United States: Historical Overview and Best Applicable Technologies Farhad Nadim, R. Carley, C. Perkins, G. Hoag, and A. Dahmani, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
• Enhanced Removal of Separate Phase Viscous Fuel by Electrical Resistance Heating & Multi-Phase Extraction David Fleming and Gregory Beyke, Thermal Remediation Services, Inc., Marietta, GA

GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION AND WATER TREATMENT

• Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Groundwater H. Eric Nuttall, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Paul Hatzinger, Envirogen, Inc., Lawrenceville, NJ; Mark Goltz, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH
• Air Sparging Wells as a Means to Deliver Nutrients to Enhance Biodegradation John J. Eisenbeis, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., Denver, CO; D. Keil and Frank Robinson, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., Woodbury, NY
• Characterizing the Intrinsic Remediation of MTBE at Field Sites in Texas Gretchen L. Shorr and H.S. Rifai, University of Houston, Houston, TX
• In Situ Aerobic Bioremediation of MTBE - A Pilot Scale Field Study Ashish Bagga and H.S. Rifai, University of Houston, Houston, TX
• A Tale of Two Plumes Ann Holbrow, J. Erskine, E. Wells, and S. Warner, Geomatrix Consultants, Inc., Oakland, CA
• Constructed Wetland System to Treat Wastewater at the BP Amoco Former Casper Refinery: Pilot-Scale Project Ari Ferro, Phytokinetics, Inc., North Logan, UT; Robert Kadlec, Wetland Management Services, Chelsea, MI
• Rapid Small Scale Column Testing for Arsenic Adsorption Media Alicia Aragon and Bruce Thomson, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Joe Chwirka, CH2M-Hill, Albuquerque, NM
• A GIS-Based Decision Support System for a Former Refinery Remediation Chris Arneson and Patricia Hettick, TriHydro Corp., Laramie, WY
• Electronic Applications of Environmental Information Management Suite (EIMS) Available for the Oil and Gas Industry Stan Belieu, Nebraska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Sidney, NE; Paul Jehn, The Ground Water Protection Council, Republic, WA; Ben Stone, New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, Santa Fe, NM

Bioremediation of Hydrocarbons II

• Bioremediation of Crude Oil in the Presence of Brine Aditya Moralwar, K.L. Sublette, L. Ford, and C. Mehta, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; K. Duncan, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; T. Todd, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
• Bioremediation of Drill Cuttings in an Arid Climate Michael Saretsky and Meredith Wilson, Ocean Energy, Inc., Houston, TX; Stuart Wyse, GeoViro Engineering, Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada
• The Future of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation: Site Closure Through Enhancement of In Situ Biological Degradation Peter Palmer, ARCADIS G&M, Inc., Tampa, FL; P.E Hall and Sharon E. Hall, ARCADIS G&M, Inc., Midland, TX
• Oily Sludge Biotreatment Adriana Ururahy Soriano, Centro de Pesquisas e Desenvolvimento da PETROBRAS ± CENPES, Cidade Universitaria, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; N. Pereira, Jr., Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitaria, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
• Soil Ecosystem Recovery Following Managed and Unmanaged Bioremediation Chintan Mehta, K.L. Sublette, and L. Ford, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; J. Brokaw, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK; K. Duncan, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; T. Todd, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Special Symposium
Environmental Issues in the Production of Coalbed Methane

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2002 8:00 am - 12:00 noon

• An Overview of the Volume, Composition and Fate of Water Co-Produced with Coalbed Methane with Examples from the Powder River and Unita Basins Cynthia Rice, USGS, Denver, CO
• Regulatory Issues Affecting Management of Produced Water from Coalbed Methane Wells John Veil, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
• Water, Water, Everywhere . . . A Holistic Analysis of CBM Produced Water Management in the Powder River Basin John R. Duda, U.S. DOE, Morgantown, WV; W. Hochheiser, U.S. DOE, Washington, D.C; Vello Kuuskraa and Jonathan Kelafant, Advanced Resources International, Arlington, VA
• Beneficial Uses to Coalbed Methane Produced Water J. Daniel Arthur, ALL Consulting, Tulsa, OK; T. Richmond, Montana Board of Oil & Gas Conservation, Billings, MT
• An Analysis of Coalbed Methane Produced Water and its Introduction into "Waters of the United States" Michelle Hunter and Randy Hicks, R.T. Hicks Consultants, Ltd., Albuquerque, NM
• Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Useful for CBM Development: Cost-Effective Ways to Manage Risk James H. Viellenave, A.W. Gorody, and J.V. Fontana, Direct Geochemical, Golden, CO
• Dissolved Organic Constituents in Coal-Associated Waters and Implications for Human and Ecosystem Health J. Berton Fisher, Exponent, Tulsa, OK; Annette Santamaria, Exponent, Houston, TX
• Analysis of Habitat Loss for Target Biota in Rivers Impacted by Long-Term Flow Increases Resulting from CBM Production James Gore, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA