THE EFFECT OF FERTILIZER USE DURING BIOREMEDIATION OF CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL ON SUBSEQUENT RESTORATION OF SOIL ECOSYSTEMS

Chintan Mehta*
Aditya Moralwar
Kerry L. Sublette
Laura Ford

University of Tulsa
600 S. College Ave.
Tulsa, OK 74104
Voice: 918-631-3334
Fax: 918-631-3268
E-mail: chintan-mehta@utulsa.edu

Josh Brokaw
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK

Kathleen Duncan
University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK

Tim Todd
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS

Greg Thoma
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR

Once the spill of produced fluids has taken place it must be remediated or "cleaned" in order to restore the economic and/or aesthetic value of the impacted land as well as preventing further contamination of soil, groundwater, and surface waters by transport of contaminants off site. But how clean is clean? One view is that the soil ecosystem is "clean" when the ecosystem is sufficiently restored to support its previous use or an acceptable alternate use. The Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium (IPEC) is studying the effects of original contamination and the remediation process on grasslands soil ecology for spills of crude oil and brine. This work will provide guidance on performing ecological risk assessments for crude oil contaminated sites by helping to define appropriate endpoints for remediation and developing appropriate indicators for these endpoints. An understanding of potential ecological impacts will be part of any risk-based decision making process for management of accidental spills of produced fluids and make for better use of limited resources.

The J6 crude oil spill site is located in The Nature Conservancy's Tallgrass Prairie Preserve, Osage County, Oklahoma. Contamination resulted from a pipeline break on January 6, 1999 releasing about 70 barrels of dewatered crude oil. Immediately downslope of the pipeline it contaminated an area of about 10,000 ft2 (J6N). The crude oil then flowed down a gully in a lease road and contaminated another area of the prairie (about 4,800 ft2, J6S). The initial total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in J6N was about 33,500 mg/kg and in J6S, 4,800 mg/kg. For the purpose of treatment comparison, each of these sites was divided into fertilized and non-fertilized sections. Further, for comparison, two types of controls have been used--one is unimpacted prairie disturbed by tilling and the other is unimpacted and undisturbed prairie.

This paper discusses the effect of managed bioremediation by fertilizer addition on the restoration of the soil ecosystems of the different test plots following remediation in terms of ecological indicators such as phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA), nematode populations, nutrient cycling and revegetation. Both the J6N and J6S sites experienced similar decreases in TPH concentrations with and without fertilizer addition. However at the higher TPH concentration (J6N) ecological indicators show that the rate of restoration of the soil ecosystem is increased by using fertilizer addition during remediation.